Free Network Build Assessment
Score your buildThat’s the week in a build where somebody finally runs the adequacy numbers and finds out the network doesn’t pass. There’s a scramble, a lot of calls to providers who were never going to sign in time, and a filing that goes in weaker than it should have.
Our team has spent about thirty years inside health plan network builds — on the plan side and in the shops that get hired when a plan is behind. Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, Exchange, D-SNP. Rural counties in states nobody wants to draw. The builds that go well and the ones that go to the wire.
The pattern never changed. Contracting lived in a CRM or a spreadsheet. Credentialing lived somewhere else. Adequacy lived in a tool somebody exported into every few weeks. Three systems, and the gap between them is exactly where a build goes wrong. Not because anyone was careless — because nothing connected the work to the score.
So we built the thing that connects them. The pipeline and the adequacy score run on the same data, in the same system, at the same moment.
Blueprint is new. We launched it this year and we’re early. What isn’t new is the judgment underneath it — which specialties actually fail, which counties are quietly impossible, what a state reviewer looks at first. That part took thirty years and you can’t shortcut it.

Harney. Malheur. Wallowa. The counties that decide whether a build passes are rarely the ones anyone worries about at kickoff.
Most vendor sites in this category are impossible to fact-check. We went the other direction, because a claim you can verify is worth more than five you can’t.
Across the team, on the health plan side and in the consultancies that serve them. It's experience, not customer proof, and we don't dress it up as customer proof.
Time and distance standards, minimum counts, and county designations, loaded and maintained. Not fifty. We'll tell you on the call whether yours is one of them.
Real, and we'll describe the work in detail. The names are confidential and stay that way until a client clears us to use theirs. We'd rather lose a deal than leak one.
We don't have any yet, so there aren't any on this site. When a customer says something worth quoting and lets us print it, we'll print it with their name on it.
Every vendor in this category has them. Ask where the number came from and watch what happens. We'll have ours when we've earned them.
Quest has had the CMS contract since 2007 and works with most of the health plans in the country. If your compliance team needs the number that CMS itself uses, that relationship isn’t ours to take, and we’ll say so on the call.
What we’re after is the twenty weeks before that measurement — the actual build, where a team is deciding who to call next and nobody can see what each signature does to the county score. That work happens in spreadsheets today. It shouldn’t.
Knowing where you sit in a market is worth more than pretending you sit everywhere.
Being early with us should be an advantage, not a risk. So the terms are built that way.
No annual lock-in. If it isn't working in month three, leave in month three. A long contract is how vendors stop having to be good.
Full export of providers, contacts, stages, and activity history any time, in a format you can actually open.
We're small. That means no ticket queue, and it also means we answer for our own decisions.
It's on the pricing page. In a market where almost everything is quote-only, that's a deliberate choice.
We’ll tell you about one. That conversation will tell you more about whether we know this work than anything written on this page.