A multi-state Exchange/QHP plan
Two states, one workspace and one playbook
Illustrative scenario based on a common network-build situation — not an actual customer. Blueprint is a new product.
Executive Summary
Consider a plan managing simultaneous Exchange/QHP network builds in Washington and Oregon — two states with separate rules, separate county requirements, and separate submission timelines, run by a single team member in Excel with no cross-state visibility. Blueprint's multi-state workspace lets that team run both builds from a single dashboard and carry the playbook from the Washington build directly into Oregon.
The Challenge
- 1
Each state requires separate builds, separate adequacy rules, and separate tracking — with zero visibility across both from a single view.
- 2
One team member managing both Washington and Oregon builds in Excel creates single-point-of-failure risk and no audit trail.
- 3
Starting the Oregon build from scratch after Washington means losing institutional knowledge and repeating duplicated effort.
The Solution
Blueprint's multi-state workspace lets one team manage both builds from a single dashboard, with state-specific adequacy rules applied automatically per county.
The Washington build serves as a template for Oregon — providers, outreach sequences, and scoring benchmarks carry over in days, not weeks.
Real-time cross-state adequacy scoring means gaps in either state surface immediately, allowing sequential prioritization of the team's time.
Key Results
2 states
One shared workspace
1 playbook
Carried state to state
Real-time
Cross-state adequacy scoring
“The repeatability is the big unlock. Same playbook, new state — no starting from zero. Blueprint carries the institutional knowledge from one state's build into the next.”
Build Timeline
How the build unfolded
Washington build imported — providers across the service area
Oregon build stood up in parallel using Washington as template; state rules auto-applied
Washington adequacy reached; team shifts focus to Oregon gap counties
Oregon gaps identified and filled via targeted FQHC outreach in rural counties
Both states submitted ahead of their adequacy review windows
Ready to see results?
Your build could look like this.
Schedule a 30-minute demo and we'll walk through Blueprint on a real network build for your state and LOB.